My Spanish teacher <u>who wears flowers in her hair</u> is very pretty . The underlined pattern is the adjective clause. It is a clause because it is a sentence; it has got a subject : <em>who</em>, and a predicate: <em>wears flowers in her hair. </em>This clause works as an adjective because it qualifies the subject of the main sentence : <em>My Spanish teacher</em>. The adjective clause gives some specific information about the Spanish teacher.
There are two main ideas for each passage, in the first one it mentions the positive outcomes of having a pet in class; it can help children with health problems and nervousness in students will decrease. In this sentences it supports the idea of a pet in class, saying the positive results of it and how it helps or it will help children.
In the second passage it mentions the negative outcomes of having a pet in class; they will make some health problems worst and the nervousness in students will increase around them. These two ideas are against the possibility of having a pet in class, mentioning how it will affect students instead of helping them.
What makes these two passages different is the opinion towards one main idea: pets in class. One passage supports it and one is against it.
Autobiography! This should be it.
The literary device used in these lines is Personification.
The personification is a figure of speech in which a thing is given human attributes. The non-human objects are portrayed in such a way that we feel they have the capacity to act like human beings. This device makes the piece more interesting to read and makes it more sensitive to the reader.
