Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
NAFTA was signed on 17th December 1992 by all three members (Mexico, US, Canada) in their respective capitals and it came to power on January 1, 1994.
They <span>Studies Oriental languages and avoids the science majors.
Both of them perceive that their imagination is to vivid to be focusing on science and they also have long-life desire to learn philosophy.
Because of this, they see study of oriental language (such as Arabic, chinese, latin) would open up a wider path for them to deepen their knowledge on philosophy.</span>
Answer:
Pharmacy, Opioids. illegal
Explanation:
