Answer: $125,000
Explanation: In simple words, owner's equity refers to the funds that are contributed by the owners of the capital for effectively conduction the operations of the business.
Any profit that the organisation made during a year is treated as a return to the capital and is added to the initial capital while drawing from the capital results in decrease in the available fund for operations.
Hence the year end balance of the capital in given case is, $1000,000 + $50,000 - $25,000 = $ 125,000
<span>Larger vehicles tend to have longer stopping distances than other vehicles because they weigh more. Vehicles that way more take more time to slow down when traveling at the same speed as a vehicle that weighs less. For this reason, they take more time to slow down and need a larger stopping distance. </span>
Answer:
Theodore Levitt
Explanation:
Theodore Levitt was an American economist and professor at the prestigious Harvard Business School (Cambridge, Massachusetts). Also editor of the economic magazine Harvard Business Review (HBR) where they published their articles. It marked a milestone in creating the concept of "globalization" focused on an economic point of view, specifically in its article "Globalization of Markets" was where he referred to it for the first time, thanks to what became very popular and joined the currents of economist thinking.
Answer:
Persuasive Advertising
Explanation:
The goal of persuasive advertising is to convince customers that your product is better and different and that they should choose it over any other option. This is different than information advertising which focuses on informing customers not persuading them.
Answer:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
Explanation:
For this case the graph attached illustrate the problem for this case
We know that the total area is 60000, so then we have:
If we solve for x we got:
(1)
Now we can define the cost function like this:
We can use the condition (1) and if we replace in the cost function we have:
Since we need to minimize the cost, we can derivate the function in terms of y and we got:
And we can solve for y and we got:
And using condition (1) we can solve for x and we got:
So then the minimum cost for this case would be:
