Answer: Both approach
Explanation:
This boils down to opinion of the masses as individuals choices differ, as most voters combine both retrospective and prospective approach when selecting their choice candidate. Some judge based on past performance of the candidate; was he successful to handling projects and Co? while others choose based what the candidate is promising to fulfill when they get into office.
Although some persons are more confident on past success of a candidate, some others would love to see changes that come with the new candidate.
False because the world is a sheep herd one person does something and everyone else decides they want to do it too this is why things go "viral"
Explanation:
States with larger populations wanted representation based on population, while smaller states demanded equal representation. The Great Compromise provided something for large states and small states. It called for representation based on population in the House and equal representation in the Senate. The committee said both parts of the compromise must be accepted or both rejected.
<span>During McKinley's presidency, the United States proved its prowess as the war with Spain, a strong European power, was fought and won. As a result, America gained overseas territories and influence in Asia, and then the President tried to normalize trade with China when he issued his "Open Door Policy." Hawaii, which eventually became the 50th<span> U.S. state, was annexed in 1900. During this period the United States established itself as a world power. Some historians believe that one thing President McKinley did for the nation was inadvertent when he made the decision to pick Theodore Roosevelt as his running mate for the 1900 election, and as a consequence, bequeathed the presidency and the welfare of the country to him</span>
</span>
