All categories

3 years ago

Beryllium has a nucleus composed of protons and neutrons. Given the data, how many neutrons are in a typical Beryllium nucleus?

2 answers:

6 0

Beryllium has a mass number of 9 and 4 protons. To find the number of neutrons you need to subtract the number of protons from the mass number. so...
neutrons = mass - # protons
neutrons = 9 - 4 = 5

Semmy [17]3 years ago

6 0

I believe the answer is C

You might be interested in

A 0. 060-kg tennis ball, moving with a speed of 5. 82 m/s , has a head-on collision with a 0. 090-kg ball initially moving in th

inn [45]

Final speed of the tennis ball, moving with a speed of 5. 82 m/s , has a head-on collision with a 0. 090-kg ball is 2.964 m/s.

<h3>What is conservation of momentum?</h3>

Momentum of an object is the force of speed of it in motion. Momentum of a moving body is the product of mass times velocity. By the law of conservation of momentum,

$m_1u_1 + m_2u_2 = (m_1+m_2)v$

Here, (m) is the mass, (u) is initial velocity before collision, v is final velocity after collision and (subscript 1, and 2) are used for body 1 and 2 respectively. Rewrite the formula for final velocity as,

$v=\dfrac{m_1u_1 + m_2u_2}{(m_1+m_2)}$

A 0. 060-kg tennis ball, moving with a speed of 5. 82 m/s, has a head-on collision with a 0. 090-kg ball, initially moving in the same direction at a speed of 3.44 m/s. Thus, the initial velocity of the second ball is,

$v_{2f}=5.82+3.44+v_{1f}\\v_{2f}=2.38+v_{1f}$

Let v1f is the final velocity of first ball. Thus, the initial velocity of the first ball is,

$v_{1f}=\dfrac{(0.060)(5.82) + (0.090)(3.44-2.38)}{(0.060)+(0.090)}\\v_{1f}=2.964\rm\; m/s$

Thus, final speed of the tennis ball, moving with a speed of 5. 82 m/s , has a head-on collision with a 0. 090-kg ball is 2.964 m/s.

Learn more about the conservation of momentum here;

brainly.com/question/7538238

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago

A can of sardines is made to move along an x axis from x = 0.47 m to x = 1.20 m by a force with a magnitude given by F = exp(–8x

sattari [20]

If the force were constant or increasing, we could guess that the speed of the sardines is increasing. Since the force is decreasing but staying in contact with the can, we know that the can is slowing down, so there must be friction involved.
Work is the integral of (force x distance) over the distance, which is just the area under the distance/force graph.
The integral of exp(-8x) dx that we need is (-1/8)exp(-8x) evaluated from 0.47 to 1.20 .

I get 0.00291 of a Joule ... seems like a very suspicious solution, but for an exponential integral at a cost of 5 measly points, what can you expect. On the other hand, it's not really too unreasonable. The force is only 0.023 Newton at the beginning, and 0.000067 newton at the end, and the distance is only about 0.7 meter, so there certainly isn't a lot of work going on. The main question we're left with after all of this is: Why sardines ? ?

6 0

2 years ago

What do the top of a zip line and the top of a bungee cord have in common

LiRa [457]

Answer:

They are both placed at high vantage points for an optimal experience.

Explanation:

Gravity works in your favor when participating in bungee jumping as well as ziplining

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

★CHECK MY ANSWER PLEASE★

Sergeu [11.5K]

You are correct!
Happy to assist you!

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Guys please helpp!!!!1

Setler79 [48]

Answer:

Position A/Position E

$K = E$ , $U = 0$

Position B/Position D

$K = (1-x)\cdot E$ , $U = x\cdot E$ , for $0 < x < 1$

Position C

$K = 0$ , $U = E$

Explanation:

Let suppose that ball-Earth system represents a conservative system. By Principle of Energy Conservation, total energy ( $E$ ) is the sum of gravitational potential energy ( $U$ ) and translational kinetic energy ( $K$ ), all measured in joules. In addition, gravitational potential energy is directly proportional to height ( $h$ ) and translational kinetic energy is directly proportional to the square of velocity.

Besides, gravitational potential energy is increased at the expense of translational kinetric energy. Then, relative amounts at each position are described below:

Position A/Position E

$K = E$ , $U = 0$

Position B/Position D

$K = (1-x)\cdot E$ , $U = x\cdot E$ , for $0 < x < 1$

Position C

$K = 0$ , $U = E$

3 0

2 years ago