1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
just olya [345]
4 years ago
10

History of britain, please help

History
1 answer:
Natalija [7]4 years ago
3 0

1. Prehistoric hunter gathers

2. Prehistoric farmers

3. The Celts

4. The Romans

5. The Anglo Saxons

6. The Vikings

7. The Anglo Saxons again

8. The Normans

And then the Dutch got the throne through marriage and then the Germans with the House of Hanover.

You might be interested in
How did American industrial leaders accumulate wealth during the late 1800s
Semenov [28]
By creating monopolies and establishing trusts
8 0
3 years ago
What is the edict of sophia
il63 [147K]

Awnser:Great Persecution of Christians.

Explanation:This was known as the "Great Persecution of Christians.” Then, in 311 Galerius issued the Edict of Sophia, an edict of tolerance in favor of Christianity. Christianity was legalized in the eastern half of the Roman Empire. over Maxentius was due to a miracle.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what way did Aristotle improve the approach of other philosophers?<br>​
sergejj [24]

Answer:

In simple words, Aristotle had such a major impact on the humanities. This influence includes his theories of inference and inference, as well as the concepts of observational study or analysis. Aristotle has tried to establish scientific foundations in subjects such as sleeping, education, physics , astronomy, as well as other disciplines.

5 0
4 years ago
Why is it so important to deal with the question of “legend” as it pertains to the resurrection?
tatuchka [14]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can comment on the following.

Why is it so important to deal with the question of “legend” as it pertains to the resurrection?

It is so important to deal with the question of “legend” as it pertains to the resurrection because as we already know, the Bible is just a perspective of how things could happen and it has no scientific or historic base.

The Old Testament basically are the stories found in the clay tablets written in Cuneiform style, from the Sumerians. In the case of the Resurrection, the story is included in the book of Luke and refers to the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth. Luke is one of the fourth authors of the gospels. The other three are Mattew, Marc, and John.

However, none of those authors knew Jesus in person; they weren't even born. They based their stories on other sources. So nobody can prove that the gospels are true.

That is why the scientific community, researchers, and historians consider the Resurrection as a legend, in the absence of any true evidence. Let's remind that legends can fall into one of these three categories: stories from religions, literary style that is not historical, and embellishments.

5 0
3 years ago
it was a mistake for the United States to make an alliance with the Soviet totalitarian communist union during World War II
butalik [34]

I'll assume that's a thesis statement meant for argument or debate.  An argument could be made on either side, depending on your point of view.  

  • On the one hand, the United States and the Soviet Union had dramatically different worldviews.  The US system of democracy and capitalism was at odds with the USSR system of totalitarian rule and communist collectivism.  The two nations were allied only for the sake of defeating Germany and Japan in the Second World War, and were in opposition to each other in about every other way.  Following the war, they became bitter opponents in the Cold War.
  • On the other hand, the USA and the other Allies in World War II needed the help of the Soviet Union in order to defeat the combined threat of Germany and Japan.  The USSR suffered millions of casualties due to the war -- more than any other nation.  They bore the brunt of the fighting against Germany, even before the US entered the war.  And President Roosevelt, while not in agreement with the governing philosophy of Joseph Stalin, still thought he was someone that could be worked with cooperatively.   (When President Truman took over after Roosevelt's death, he did not share that same view of Stalin and the USSR.)

So the matter can be argued from both sides.  Pick your side and write a strong essay!

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Sarah Vaughan most famous for?
    7·2 answers
  • 1. Based on the data presented in your study unit, which one of the following individuals would be most likely to vote? A. A 19-
    6·1 answer
  • The main function of the Legislative Branch is to
    8·2 answers
  • Company logos are protected by __________. A. patents B. insignias C. trademarks D. copyrights
    5·1 answer
  • Which Cold War belief or idea about communism does Nixon present in this speech?
    14·2 answers
  • During World War I, the British army fought several battles against the Ottoman Turks near Egypt. England's main priority in thi
    7·1 answer
  • Give examples that proves that the Civil War played a role in advancing US industrial progress.
    9·1 answer
  • Explain how both the state of Texas and its citizens did their part to contribute to the war efforts in both WW I and WWII.
    13·1 answer
  • Select all that apply. Which decisions are made in all types of economic systems?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did China &amp; the USSR aid him?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!