1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zolol [24]
3 years ago
11

Turner, Roth, and Lowe are partners who share income and loss in a 2:3:5 ratio (in percents: Turner, 20%; Roth, 30%; and Lowe, 5

0%). The partners decide to liquidate the partnership. Immediately before liquidation, the partnership balance sheet shows total assets, $138,000; total liabilities, $88,000; Turner, Capital, $3,500; Roth, Capital, $14,500; and Lowe, Capital, $32,000. Cash received from selling the assets was sufficient to repay all but $33,000 to the creditors. Assume that the Turner, Roth, and Lowe partnership is a limited partnership. Turner and Roth are general partners and Lowe is a limited partner. How much should each partner contribute to cover the remaining capital deficiency of $33,000? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Losses and deficits amounts to be deducted should be entered with a minus sign.)
Business
1 answer:
solong [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The capital deficiency of $33,000 will be shared between Turner and Roth in the proportion of their income and loss sharing ratio of 2:3.

Turner will need to further contribute $13,200 ($33,000 x 2/5)

Roth will contribute $19,800 ($33,000 x 3/5)

Lowe is a limited partner and will not contribute to the capital deficiency.

Explanation:

Lowe as a limited partner is a part-owner of the partnership but his liability for the firm's debts cannot exceed $32,000 being the amount that has invested in the company.  As a silent partner, Lowe does not participate in the management of the company.

The Limited Partnership of Turner, Roth, and Lowe is a partnership consisting of general partner(s) like Turner and Roth, who manage the business and have unlimited personal liabilities for the debts and obligations of the Limited Partnership and Lowe as the limited partner.  Whereas, Turner and Roth are in charge of the management of the company, Lowe is a silent partner.

You might be interested in
On January 3, 2014, Trusty Delivery Service purchased a truck at a cost of $90,000. Before placing the truck in service, Trusty
likoan [24]

Answer:

Accumulated depreciation for Years 1 - 5 under:

  • the Straight-line method is $90,000.
  • the Units-of-production method is $90,000.
  • the Double-declining-balance method is $86,170.

Explanation:

The total cost of the asset is $90,000 + $3,000 + $1,500 + $4,500 = $99,000, since all the other costs were directly attributable cost and were necessary to bring the asset to usable form.

  • The painting is capitalized because it is the first time Trust Delivery would be using the asset, otherwise it would have been expended
  • Overhauling cost can be regarded as a separate asset, if we were provided with different useful lives - componentization.

Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / No of years = ($99,000 - $9,000) / 5 years = $18,000 yearly depreciation expense.

Accumulated depreciation for Years 1 to 5 is $18,000 x 5 years $90,000.

The unit-of-production method is used when the asset value closely relates to the units of output it is able to produce. It is expressed with the formula below:

(Original Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated production capacity x Units/year

At Year 1, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($99,000 - $9,000) / 100,000 miles x 22,500 miles = $20,250/year

Accumulated depreciation for the first four years is $20,250 x 4 years = $81,000.

At Year 5, depreciation = $90,000 / 100,000 miles x 10,000 miles = $9,000

Note that this depreciation method results in higher depreciation charge when the asset is heavily used, at this time, it was in Years 1 - 4.

Accumulated depreciation expense for Years 1 to 5, under this method, is $90,000 (addition of first four years and the Year 5).

The double-declining method is otherwise known as the reducing balance method and is given by the formula below:

Double declining method = 2 X SLDP X BV

SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage

BV = Book value

SLDP is 100%/5years = 20%, then 20% multiplied by 2 to give 40%

At Year 1, 40% X $99,000 = $39,600

At Year 2, 40% X $59,400 ($99,000 - $39,600) = $23,760

At Year 3, 40% X $35,640 ($59,400 - $23,760) = $14,256

At Year 4, 40% X $21,384 ($35,640 - $14,256) = $8,554 approximately (the depreciation expense would stop at this stage since the amount falls below the residual value).

Accumulated depreciation expense for Years 1 to 4, under this method, is $86,170 (addition of all the yearly depreciation).

7 0
3 years ago
Fiona and her fellow Green Committee members are studying the effects of the use of energy-efficient light bulbs. Which of these
Kamila [148]
The correct answer is B.) Hope this helps!
3 0
3 years ago
Career selection should be based on salary alone. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F
Ksivusya [100]

Answer: False, career selection should not be based on salary alone.

Explanation: When choosing a career it is important to consider several aspects such as your abilities to perform the task the job requires and how much you would enjoy the job.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A shift in the demand curve for pretzels increases the price of pretzels from $1.25 to $1.75 and its quantity demanded from 30 m
Sever21 [200]
Initial price, P₀ = $1.25
Initial demand, Q₀ = 30 million

New price, P₁ = $1.75
New demand, Q₁ = 35 million

By definition, price elasticity is
\eta = \frac{(Q_{1}-Q_{0})/(Q_{1}+Q_{0})}{(P_{1}-P_{0})/(P_{1}+P_{0})}
η = (5/65)/(0.5/3)
   = 0.4615

Answer: η = 0.46 (nearest hundredth)

This means that greater demand makes it possible to increase the price. Usually, this is not the case because lowering the price increases sales.

6 0
3 years ago
Recommend financial reporting and auditing-related reforms that would likely be effective in preventing or detecting frauds simi
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

The answer is stated below:

Explanation:

If the SEC and the AICPA, worked altogether in order to share the information, they might have detected the fraud prior. The case states that the Madoff Securities does not required to submit the peer review program to AICPA as Friehling, had recorded that he did not perform or conduct any audits.

Recommendation

1. The policy execution for the exchange of the information among the two firms would be useful to detect the fraud.

2. The PCAOB should spend more resources an attending the hotline of whistle blowing through executing the policies which need certain complaints to be addressed effectively.

3. The firms or company should have done more in order to verify the financial statements assertions, which surrounds the investments. The PCAOB need to execute the policy that require the companies (such as Madoff Securities) to correctly answer the inquiries of the auditor.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Flyer Company sells a product in a competitive marketplace. Market analysis indicates that its product would probably sell at $4
    12·1 answer
  • A salesperson earns a weekly salary of $600 plus a commission of 1 percent of sales over $2,000. If he earned $650 in a certain
    8·1 answer
  • The four level pyramid model revolves around which aspect of an organization? The four-level pyramid model revolves around the _
    5·1 answer
  • Lupo Corporation uses a job-order costing system with a single plantwide predetermined overhead rate based on machine-hours. The
    5·2 answers
  • Who is the government attempting to help by enforcing fraud laws?
    14·1 answer
  • The most productive way to find a job lead is to
    15·2 answers
  • Operations management is applicable: Question 4 options: A) mostly to the service sector. B) mostly to the manufacturing sector.
    13·1 answer
  • Principal, $3000 × annual interest rate, 5/2% × years​​,7/2
    13·1 answer
  • The return on total assets is computed by dividing net sales by average total assets. net income by ending total assets. net inc
    6·1 answer
  • In a designed experiment, a(n) _____ measures the difference that a factor has on the response.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!