Answer:
Chamberlain did what he could (should not have done it in any other way).
Explanation:
Chamberlain in his position as UK Prime Minister, going to such events as the Munich Conference, Germany was prepared for both options if Hitler refused or not. Hitler only agreed to stall time and his preparations for Czechoslovakia were already underway. If Chamberlain demanded better terms then Hitler would most likely refuse to sign it. It is possible if Britain and France had said something about the Remilitarization of the Rhineland then Hitler would have stopped these moves of aggression. Obviously, this move was a huge gamble for Hitler that paid off since France and Britain lacked the knowledge of a semi-weak Germany; instead, they saw legions of soldiers marching into the Rhineland fearing another war would come. If Chamberlain refused to negotiate, then that throws diplomacy right out the window and both Britain and France did not want to start another war so that is out of the question.
The hamlet program...... I hope this helped :)
Wealth had become concentrated in the hands of foreign investors and a small Mexican elite. Most mexicans lived in poverty and opposition to diez grew steadily. In 1910 porifio diez ran for a re-election , as in earlier elections diez controlled the outcome just before the election began he jailed his opponant Francisco Madero. When the ballots were counted diez claimed he had a million votes and Madero had fewer than 200. Good luck! :D
Explanation:
Public opinion polls also affect how much money candidates receive in campaign donations. Donors assume public opinion polls are accurate enough to determine who the top two to three primary candidates will be, and they give money to those who do well.
Answer:
the answer is number three, "were put down, but their ideals persisted"
Explanation:
