Answer:
cruel and oppressive government or rule.
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Gerhard Lenski
Explanation:
Harold R. Kerbo tried to synthesize the functionalist and conflict perspectives. His analysis is based on the work of Gerhard Lenski .Harold R. Kerbo has been a professor of sociology at Cal Poly since 1977. Professor Kerbo has published several books and numerous articles on the subjects of social stratification, comparative societies, and economic development and world poverty. He has argued that stratification system are institutions that have evolved in order to reduce the conflict. There would be continuing conflict and aggression over the distribution of scarce resource without the system of stratification. When the question arises that who gets what and why, institutionalized inequality gives the answers.
An enslaved person could be granted freedom by the state government.
Explanation
Enslaved person could not testify against a white. Slave codes were a series of codes which codified the behavior of the slave owners and the slaves. Slaves codes were designed by the whites in order to promote the slave labor.
During the time of emancipation proclamation, many slaves were set to be free. Freedman is the person who was set to be free from the clutches of slavery. Enslaved person could not purchase or own any property as he is considered to be equal to a property who can be bought and sold. slave codes were once legitimized in United states of America. After the civil war and the African american enfranchisement, slavery reduced in america.
Answer:
Conjunction Fallacy.
Explanation:
Conjunction Fallacy is a faulty reasoning which occurs when one assume that a conjunction of two reasons is more probable than one of the two reasons or occurring of those two events separately.
This further brings to fallacy when one assumes that complex details are more presumed to be true than the general ones. This fallacy is also known with other name, that is, Linda Problem.
So, the correct answer is Conjunction Fallacy.
Answer:
by starting his own boycotts