Hello. You did not underline the word, so I will show a synonym for each word (which may have a synonym) in the above phase.
Answer:
- Monkeys: primates
- Attention: concentration
- Choices: predilection
- Became: converted
- Random: aleatory
Explanation:
"Synonym" is the linguistic term that represents two words that are written and pronounced differently, but have the same meaning and can be replaced by each other, in a sentence, without changing the meaning and the message conveyed by the sentence.
Answer:
ince it drove countries against each other, as nationalists were all trying to prove their country to be superior. For example, a nationalist action that relates to World War 1 was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.
Explanation:
hopefully this helped
Answer:
Structural Functionalism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the study is an example of Structural Functionalism. In the context of sociology, this term refers to a theory made in order to explain why society functions in the way that it does, by emphasizing relationships between social institutions and society. Therefore a study attempting to find out why society likes a certain story as opposed to another one would be an example of this theory.
Answer:
Personality
Explanation:
As described by Scheier and Carver in 1985 optimism could be described as a balanced trait of personality, linked to positive expectations about future events. Optimists are the individuals expecting good things to happen to them, while pessimists contradicts them by their expectation in negative things. as per the question, Matt saw things from the bright side which is a trait of optimist personality.
<em>How do you think Voltaire's trip to England was a turning point for him and for the Enlightenment? </em>
He was influed by the freedom (by the time's standards) he found in England comparing to France.
<em>Why do you think Denis Diderot said that an intolerant man is an evil man? Do you agree? Explain your answer. </em>
Yes, I agree. Because to be intolerant means not to listen to the other side and acknowldege their right to have a different opinion, this can lead to de-humanization of the opponent to the point of justifying any evil act towards him/her.
<em>Why do you think the philosophes never recognized their own prejudices about women? </em>
Maybe they are the product of their time, they are humans, and as any normal human being they are/were failable. Sometimes they could see things that no-one had ever seen before but sometimes they failed to acknowledge their mistakes and their times' mistakes.
