Answer:
They moved so they could participate in trade. They were divided over income from trade. They were divided over European culture.
Explanation:
Answer:
They formed a federalist government but I'm not quite sure due to how the question is worded. I'd go with democratic.
Explanation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Australia_(1901%E2%80%9345) check out this site it might help you.
Answer:
That statement is false
Explanation:
It's the other way around. Their research shows that when the canadians put in the same situation, their judgement regarding acts of violence actually similar and consistent with the judgement made by the americans.
(this research finding is a little bit surprising because Canadians are more well known to have a more polite and gentle culture)
In general , their judgement regarding acts of violence can be influenced by their primal human instincts.
For example, the research showed that:
- both canadians and Americans overwhelmingly approved that acts of violence are justifiable if being done toward people who are broken into their house.
- Both Canadians and Americans overwhelmingly disapproved of acts of violence toward group of protesters.
Answer:
look for an answer that has an ' if , then statement" ex: if I dont study , then I will fail. "
Answer:
Courtesy, is the correct answer.
Explanation:
An informal, unofficial, unwritten political custom whereby all the nominations for the federal judicial posts at the state level are not approved if they are engaged by a senator from the state in which the appointee will work, is known as the Senatorial courtesy. This same concept is applicable to the courts of appeal when the state senator opposes the nominee.
