The answer is: Conscientiousness
People with high level of Conscientiousness Tend to have an inept personal desire to continue do they best thing they can in every task that they're assigned to.
This type of people tend to really discipline in managing their time and generally had higher chance in reaching high ranking position compared to average people.
Answer: The correct answer is c) It does not provide for everyoned.
Explanation:
In a market economy, the problem is that we are not born with the same opportunities, nor the possibility of accessing the same factors of production, nor are we equally qualified in all fields. That is, those who are born in a family with less economic resources, or simply are not enabled in activities that have more benefits, are at a disadvantage compared to the rest of the individuals. These inequalities end up generating inequalities in income distribution.
The answer is True. Hope this helps
Answer:
Positive.
Explanation:
A linear function has a positive relationship and as such an increase in one variable (input variable) causes an increase in the other variable (output variable) i.e the variables are directly proportional. Thus, the graph of a linear function is a straight-line and its slope is always constant.
On the other hand, nonlinear function has a negative relationship and as such an increase in one variable (input variable) causes a decrease in the other variable (output variable) i.e the variables are inversely proportional.
This ultimately implies that, the graph of a nonlinear function is a curved line and whose direction is constantly changing
In this scenario, the relationship between numbers of adjectives and newspaper sales must be positive because the higher the amount of adjectives put in the titles of her articles, the greater the number of newspapers that would be sold on a particular day.
Answer:
A- Both firms will set the price at $35
Explanation:
When there is no collusion,
When Y charges $40, X's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($59 > $57).
When Y charges $35, X's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($55 > $50).
When X charges $40, Y's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($69 > $60).
When X charges $35, Y's best strategy is to charge $35 since payoff is higher ($58 > $59).
Therefore Nash equilibrium is: ($35, $35).
