Answer: (B)
The court ruled that political action committees (PACs) could accept unlimited contributions for making "Independent Expenditures"
Explanation:
Political Action Committees (PACs) are independent groups created to raise money in support of a particular candidate.
Prior to the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, the amount of money that could be contributed to PACs was limited.
In 2010, the supreme court ruled in favor of Citizens United, in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
The ruling was that corporations and unions were allowed to spend as much as they wanted to, in support of their chosen candidates as long as the corporations were independent of the campaigns. Therefore PACs could receive unlimited contributions.
According to the Supreme court, political spending is protected under the 1st amendment, as it is a form of free speech.
This was an important case as it helped ease the restrictions on political spending.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The statement 'In internet industry the lines of competition are indistinct' can be considered True.
For an instance, Elance and oDesk were two freelancing websites where clients would post projects and hire freelancers over internet to get their job done.
Later on both the websites were merged into a single bigger site now known as the 'Upwork'.
Hence, it is true that in internet industry the companies that are competitors of each other can become partners the other day.
Answer:
The answer to this question is D.Domestic violence creates a substantial impact on the economy annually.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. God sent many plaques to Egypt
