Answer:
The correct answer is option B.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
If the number of firms in an industry decreases, the overall market supply will decrease. This decrease in supply will cause the market supply curve to shift to the left. So the statement given in the question is false.
The cost of production is inversely related to supply. An increase in the cost of production causes supply to decline, shifting the curve to the left and vice versa.
Technology and productivity are directly related, an improvement in technology will cause the supply to increase shifting the curve to the right.
Taxes cause the supply to decrease as it is seen as a cost and it reduces the price received by the firms. This causes the supply curve to shift to the left.
Subsidies reduce the cost of production so the supply curve shifts to the left.
Annual growth rate of population is 16.3%
monthly growth rate = ?
Months in one year = 12
let x be the monthly growth of population.
16.3% = 0.163
1+ 0.163 = 1.163
Now, (1.163)¹/¹² = 1.01266
for monthly growth percent
1.01266 - 1 = 0.01266 = 0.01266 x 100 = 1.266%≈ 1.3%
Because it helps them finish whatever project they are working and helps them and thats it and plz give me thanks and brainliest if u can
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Marginal Benefit is addition to total benefit due to a business decision.
Marginal Cost is addition to total cost due to a business decision.
Marginal Benefit & Marginal Costs are determinants while considering a business decision. A decision will be taken if : Marginal Benefit ≥ Marginal Cost, as entrepreneurial decision maker would be better off or at least neutral while taking decision. If MB < MC , it is loss making for the entrepreneur to take that decision & hence is discouraged to take that.
Answer:
confused
Explanation:
The goods whose demand decreases in the market when the consumer income rises are known as inferior goods.
The goods whose demand increases in the market when the consumer income rises are known as normal goods.
Thus, the reasoning of the student is confused as the classification of the goods on the basics of normal or inferior depends on response of the demand when there is a change in consumer's income. Thus, the student's own perception about such classification is confused.
