A certain politician has a brilliant idea. he will increase his popularity and assure reelection by giving away cash to everybod
y in the country. he will give $1 to a certain u.s. citizen, $2 to another, $3 to another, and so on until he has given away $297,624,985 to the 297,624,985th and last citizen of the united states.
<span>Put all of these numbers in a line...obviously, don't put ALL of them, but enough so you can see what you're doing.
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 297,624,985
Now put all these numbers BACKWARDS underneath that.
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 297,624,985
297,624,985 + 297,624,984 + 297,624,983 + ... + 1
Now add the first series to the second, and you'll see that they add up to:
297,624,986 + 297,624,986 + 297,624,986 + ...297,624,986
Since there were 297,624,985 terms, the total sum here is
297,624,986 * 297,624,985
But since you added it twice, you divide it by two:
148,812,493 * 297,624,985
This is 44,290,315,996,937,605, so...yes, it is MUCH larger.</span>
I believe the answer is: c. were not a part of the contract unless Chloe expressly agreed to them.
Additional terms cannot be considered as a part of the main contract. For an additional term become legally binding, there are several criterias that shall be met:
(a) the signers expressly conveys acceptance to the terms of the offer;
(b) the material would not be altered
(c) There is no notification of objection to them is given after the notice is received.
The process results in four daughter cells that are haploid, which means they contain half the number of chromosomes of the diploid parent cell. Meiosis has both similarities to and differences from mitosis, which is a cell division process in which a parent cell produces two identical daughter cells.
<em>Yes, but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Breach of contract is a legitimate reason for activity and a sort of common wrong, wherein a sound understanding of anticipated trade isn't regarded by at least one of the gatherings to the agreement by non-execution or obstruction with the other party's presentation.
A material breach is the most genuine type of break of agreement. In these cases, somebody has failed to maintain their obligations as spread out in the contract. At the point when this happens, the harmed party can seek after harms in a standard suit. In the end, when a contractual worker finishes an undertaking yet isn't paid, this is viewed as a material breach.