Answer:
g(x) = x+1
Step-by-step explanation:
Informally, you can see that the function h(x) takes the root of a value that is 1 more than the value under the same radical in f(x). This suggests that adding 1 to x in f(x) will give you h(x). That is, ...
h(x) = f(x+1) = f(g(x))
so
g(x) = x+1
_____
More formally, you can apply the inverse of the function f(x) to the equation ...
h(x) = f(g(x))
f^-1(h(x)) = f^-1(f(g(x))) . . . inverse function applied
f^-1(h(x)) = g(x) . . . . . . . . . simplified
Now f^-1(x) can be found by solving for y in ...
x = f(y)
x = ∛(y+2) . . . . . . . . . definition of f(y)
x^3 = y+2 . . . . . . . . . cube both sides
x^3 -2 = y = f^-1(x) . . . subtract 2 from both sides
So, f^-1(h(x)) is ...
f^-1(h(x)) = g(x) = (∛(x+3))^3 -2 = x+3 -2
g(x) = x+1
for any fraction a/b, the decimal format of it is just a ÷ b.
A)
is the number rational?
well, a rational number is one we can write as a ration or fraction, well clearly is a fraction so it is rational.
B)
can it be written as a repeating/recurring decimal? well, 9/20 is 0.45, so -9/20 is -0.45, no repeating decimal like 0.454545......... , just a plain vanilla -0.45, so nope.
C)
is it less than -0.4?
well, let's recall that for the negative side on the number line, the closer to 0, the larger the number, so then -1,000,000 is much smaller than -1, because -1 is closer to 0.
who is closer -0.4 or -0.45?
|--------------------- -0.45 -------- -0.40 ------------------- 0 --------------- 1 -------------------|
so, -0.45 is farther from 0, and therefore is smaller than -0.4, so yes.
Answer:
proportional graph is a straight line that always goes through the origin. A non-proportional graph is a straight line that does not go through the origin.
Step-by-step explanation:
