Answer:
A) Price 7,080 U
B) Quantity 4,630.5 U
C) Total 11.710,5 U
Explanation:
DIRECT MATERIALS VARIANCES
std cost $3.45
actual cost $3.65
quantity 35,400
difference $(0.20)
price variance $(7,080.00)
std quantity 36110.00
actual quantity 35400.00
std cost $3.45
difference 710.00
quantity variance $2,449.50
Total Variance: 2,449.5 - 7,080 = -4.630,5
Answer:
C) defensive
Explanation:
Defensive stocks are stocks that generally perform well during economic recessions. In other words, their price is not related to the market tendency. Even if the market goes down, their price remains stable. Generally companies that sell products with a constant demand are considered defensive stocks, e.g. Costco, Target, Walmart, utilities (all, electric, gas, water), etc.
Answer:
B) lower price increase quantit
Explanation:
It results in lower short run average cost in economies of sale .
<h3>Economies of scale</h3>
Economies of scale refers to the situation where, as the quantity of output goes up, the cost per unit goes down. This is the idea behind “warehouse stores” like Costco or Walmart. In everyday language: a larger factory can produce at a lower average cost than a smaller factory. Figure 2 illustrates the idea of economies of scale, showing the average cost of producing an alarm clock falling as the quantity of output rises. For a small-sized factory like S, with an output level of 1,000, the average cost of production is $12 per alarm clock. For a medium-sized factory like M, with an output level of 2,000, the average cost of production falls to $8 per alarm clock. For a large factory like L, with an output of 5,000, the average cost of production declines still further to $4 per alarm clock.
One prominent example of economies of scale occurs in the chemical industry. Chemical plants have a lot of pipes. The cost of the materials for producing a pipe is related to the circumference of the pipe and its length. However, the volume of chemicals that can flow through a pipe is determined by the cross-section area of the pipe.
Learn more about economies of scale here :
brainly.com/question/15605103
#SPJ4
Answer:
A
- M1 change = $500
- M2 change = $0
B
- M1 change = -$340
- M2 change = -$180
Explanation:
A. M1 includes actual liquid cash in hand as well as cash in checking deposits.
M2 includes M1 as well as savings deposits and time deposits amongst others.
M1 change = +$500
$500 went from the Savings account which was not part of M1 to M1.
M2 change = $0
The money went from Savings to Checking which are both part of M2.
B.
M1 change = -$-180 - ( 500 - 180 -160 ) = -$340
Tax of $180 went out of the supply as tax. Jane deposits the remaining cash after paying $160 for goods into the savings account which is not part of M1. That remaining cash is = 500 - 180 - 160 = $160.
M2 change = -500 + 160 + 160 = -$180
For M2, only taxes will reduce money from it because the rest goes to checking deposits and savings accounts both of which are part of M2
