Answer:
A). Paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article.
C). Ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community.
D). Interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other.
Explanation:
Ethically acceptable scenarios would be associated with the scenarios that are morally accurate and corresponds to impartiality, responsibility, credibility, truth, and ethics.
As per the question, options A, C, and D would be considered as ethically acceptable scenarios as they correspond to unbiased, authentic, and credible information to be presented to the viewers. <em>'paying money to attend a research' would assist in offering a wider dimension and credible information while 'ending an investigation as it may violence and disunity' exemplify 'responsibility' which is the key code of ethics and 'interviewing two CEO's' would help present an unbiased representation.</em> Thus, <u>options A, C, and D</u> are correct.
<span>There was a proud and very profane young man... But it pleased God before they came half seas over, to smite this young man with a grievous disease, of which he died in a desperate manner, and so was himself the first that was thrown overboard.
</span>
Answer:ay3
Explanation:doingyourmom12345
