Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
<span><span>The Espionage Act of 1917
was created to forbid intrusion of military operations and military
recruitment. It was also intended to
stop insubordination in the military, and to check the assistance of enemies of
the United States during times of war. In 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court </span>solidly
declared through Schenck vs. United States that
the act did not disregard the freedom
of speech of those sentenced under its provisions. The case of Charles Schenck who was the
general secretary of the Executive Committee of the Socialist Party who
distributed leaflets exhorting men not to obey the draft because
they considered involuntary servitude.
Schenck and a fellow named were convicted because the court defended the
decision because the situation during times of war require stricter measures
compared to times of peace of the presence of dangerous forces.</span>
One Difficulty that early researchers encountered in identifying the good judge of personality was that a good judge in one content was not always a good judge in other contexts. hope this helps..:)
Ok so this is going to be long...
But here you go :)
Brazil Natural Resources mainly include:
<span>Iron Ore
Manganese
Bauxite
Nickel
Granite
Limestone
Clay
Sand
Tin
Gold
Platinum
Uranium
Gems
</span><span>Petroleum
Phosphates
Timber
<span>Hydroelectric Power</span></span>
