In my opinion i think its B, which leads to Check & Balances between the 3 Branches, Executive, Legislative, & Judicial. & it's creation to those 3 Branches as well.
<span />
Answer:
Following are the measure to maintain peace in family and society are:
1. Prepare for a Spiritual Workout
2. Be a First Responder
3. Replace Anger with Pity
4. Forgive
5. Be a Peace Leader
Answer:
The pro of the 11th amendment are that states cannot be sued by a citizen who does not live in that state in federal court. The con is that states gain some immunity and you cannot petition them for lost property or funds.
Explanation:
The Pros of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment to the US Constitution is a complicated but short amendment that has various implications. Basically it says that the federal courts of the United States cannot hear cases where a citizen who lives in another state or the citizen of another country is petitioning to sue that state. This gives individual states their sovereignty so they can act without bringing upon themselves a lawsuit. It is also good in terms of our state taxes and the costs to administrate the state. It seems that before the 11th Amendment of the US Constitution was ratified, most of the cases that were brought against a state in this way were suing the state for money they had failed to pay back or the return of property. This is the case with a British citizen named William Vassall who apparently sued the state of Massachusetts for the land they confiscated from him during the Revolutionary War. This would become an expensive process for each state if it were still possible.
The Cons of the 11th amendment:
The 11th Amendment has negative implications too in the sense that you can be wronged by a state and you will never be able to redress it by appealing to federal courts. It gives states a level of immunity if they are confiscating property from people who live out of state or who come from another country. It seems to put the rights of the state above the rights of a citizen or foreign citizen in this regard.
Answer:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
Explanation:
This question is incomplete. The options are:
a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
b)Solicitation with promise of reward.
c) Appropriate.
d) Generalized
e) Positional authority.
In psychology, coercion is the act of forcing another person to act in a way that the person doesn't want to by using force or threats. This threats can include punishment if the person doesn't act the way the other person is asking to.
In this example Mathew promises to fire her if she doesn't engage in sexual activity with him. T<u>his "promise" is more like a threat and the consequence of not complying with it would be the punishment of getting fired</u>. Therefore, the right answer would be that this type of sexual harassment is a) Coercion with threat of punishment.
The war that was being waged against Germany was mostly an economic one. Limited opportunities in terms of trading with other nations, partial blockade against their exports, lesser chances of becoming loans for the Germant government all substantially worsened the situation of Germany in the times of the armistice.
