The answer to this question is: <span>Even the king must respect certain rights of the people.
Before the creation of Magna Charta, the power of a king in England is unlimited. During this period, the King was able to punish whoever he feel pleased even without proof of wrongdoings.
The creation of Magna Charta make the King exposed to the risk of law which makes him more accountable when he's doing something that violates human rights</span>
The correct answer is C. The Arab Spring protests reflected global cultural diffusion because they relied heavily on global communication technology to succeed.
The role that the Internet played in these revolutions and social networks is being widely discussed among those who defend it as a great cause of the revolts and who cite it simply as a change in the media and never as a profound cause. In any case, the rapid communication through the Network has served to have their own characteristics, such as spontaneity and the clear absence of leadership. In the Egyptian case, in addition, Internet was revealed so important that it was banned by the government along with mobile phones and, a few days later, to the Al Jazeera television network, which was broadcasting 24 hours on the Internet. However, the Egyptians have been able to communicate through ruses and old technologies such as fax.
When did the Salem witch trials take place?
February 1692 – May 1693
Where did the trials take place?
Salem, Massachusetts
who were the main individuals?
George Burroughs of Wells, John Proctor, George Jacobs, John Willard, Giles Corey and Martha his wife, Rebecca Nurse and Sarah Good, all of Salem aforesaid; Elizabeth Howe of Ipswich; Mary Easty, Sarah Wildes
What were the main events?
Salem Marshal Deputy Samuel Brabrook arrests four-year-old Dorcas Good. March 24, 1692: Corwin and Hathorne examine Rebecca Nurse. March 26, 1692: Hathorne and Corwin interrogate Dorcas. March 28, 1692: Elizabeth Proctor is accused of witchcraft.
When did the trails end?
May 1693
What were the effects?
Changes in the American Legal System
:} hope this helps!!
Similar to how they felt about the rest of the proposed federal government, the Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution granted too much power to the federal courts, at the expense of the state and local courts. They argued that the federal courts would be too far away to provide justice to the average citizen.
