Answer:
The level of racial segregation in schools has important implications for the educational outcomes of minority students. ... Nationwide, minority students continue to be concentrated in high-poverty, low-achieving schools, while white students are more likely to attend high-achieving, more affluent schools.
The monarchy lasted for hundreds of years in Russia and Stalin's rule was only thirty, there were many different Tsars, cruel ones, enlightened ones, clever ones, pious ones, stupid ones and despotic ones. So I'll compare Stalin to the monarchies of the last two Tsars, Alexander III and Nicholas II.
<span>Similarities: </span>
<span>Life was cheap - the Tsar and Stalin thought nothing of having political rivals exiled, Stalin was crueler and had more executed. </span>
<span>The State played the biggest role in industrialisation. Under Alexander and Nicholas the country was beginning to industrialise, but the industrialisation was for iron and steel for railways and guns, textiles for uniforms and coal to fire the furnaces of industry. </span>
<span>For the peasants movement was limited, there was an internal passport system, so people could not simply move around if they fancied it. </span>
<span>Both had enormous secret police organisation. </span>
<span>Differences: </span>
<span>The Monarchy was bound up with the Orthodox church; Stalin, despite training for the priesthood, was an atheist and hostile to the church. </span>
<span>The Monarchy was fabulously wealthy, as were most of the aristocracy; Stalin lived a modest life, he had no palaces, no court jeweller and no crown jewels. </span>
<span>The poor were exceptionally poor under the Tsars, the peasants were mostly subsistence farmers not wealthy farmers. </span>
<span>Education under the Tsars was very poor - just 5% were literate; Education was very good under Stalin 95% literacy. </span>
<span>Most people lived in the countryside under the Tsars' they were urban dwellers under Stalin. </span>
<span>Only the aristocracy could have political influence under the Tsars; only party members could have political influence under Stalin. </span>
<span>Women could not be educated, begin divorce proceedings, stand for political office, have an abortion or had many career opportunities; they could do all these things under Stalin </span>
<span>Both were cruel despotisms, Stalin was crueller, but, for those who did not fall foul of the regime, life was better in many ways under Stalin.</span>
Africa
Algeria
Angola
Anglo-Egyptian Sudan
Basutoland
Bechuanaland
Belgian Congo
British East Africa (Kenya)
British Gold Coast
British Somaliland
Cameroon
Cabinda
Egypt
Eritrea
French Equatorial Africa
Gabun
Middle Congo
Ubangi-Schari
French Somaliland
French West Africa
Dahomey
Guinea
Ivory Coast
Mauretania
Senegal
Upper Senegal and Niger
Gambia
German East Africa
Italian Somaliland
Liberia
Madagascar
Morocco
Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique)
Nigeria
Northern Rhodesia
Nyasaland
Sierra Leone
South Africa
South West Africa (Namibia)
Southern Rhodesia
Togoland
Tripoli
Tunisia
Uganda and Zanzibar
America
Brazil
Canada
Costa Rica
Cuba
Falkland Islands
Guatemala
Haiti
Honduras
Guadeloupe
Newfoundland
Nicaragua
Panama
Philippines
U.S.A
West Indies
Bahamas
Barbados
British Guiana
British Honduras
French Guiana
Grenada
Jamaica
Leeward Islands
St. Lucia
St. Vincent
Trinidad and Tobago
Asia
Aden
Arabia
Bahrein
El Qatar
Kuwait
Trucial Oman
Borneo
Ceylon
China
India
Japan
Persia
Russia
Siam
Singapore
Transcaucasia
Turkey
Australasia and Pacific Islands
Antipodes
Auckland
Austral Islands
Australia
Bismarck Archipelgeo
Bounty
Campbell
Carolina Islands
Chatham Islands
Christmas
Cook Islands
Ducie
Elice Islands
Fanning
Flint
Fiji Islands
Gilbert Islands
Kermadec Islands
Macquarie
Malden
Mariana Islands
Marquesas Islands
Marshal Islands
New Guinea
New Caledonia
New Hebrides
New Zealand
Norfolk
Palau Islands
Palmyra
Paumoto Islands
Pitcairn
Pheonix Islands
Samoa Islands
Solomon Islands
Tokelau Islands
Tonga
Europe
Albania
Austria-Hungary
Belgium
Bulgaria
Czechoslovakia
Estonia
Finland
France
Great Britain
Germany
Greece
ItalySan Marino
Serbia
Turkey
Atlantic Islands
Ascension
Sandwich Islands
South Georgia
St. Helena
Tristan da Cunha
Indian Ocean Islands
Andaman Islands
Cocos Islands
Mauritius
Nicobar Islands
Reunion
SeychellesLatvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Montenegro
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
San Marino
Serbia
<span>Turkey
</span>
the main contribution of the austrians in the time period from 1500 to 1800 was the halting of the advances of the Ottoman Turks
The so-called "Ottomans" came into Western consciousness when they relocated from their native Central Asia to the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum in Anatolia in the 13th century. In Western Anatolia, the Ottoman Turks established a beylik with Söüt as its capital under Ertugrul's rule. The chief of the nomadic Kay tribe, Ertugrul, established the first principality during the final years of the Seljuk empire. His son Osman expanded the principality, and in recognition of him, Europeans gave the people and the political system the name "Ottomans" ("Ottoman" being a corruption of "Osman"). Osman's son Orhan turned the expanding area into an empire in 1362 with the conquest of Nicaea (modern-day Znik) and the traversal of the Dardanelles.
Learn More About Ottoman:
brainly.com/question/8574066
#SPJ4