1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
3 years ago
15

Do you think it was a mistake for the british to use mercenaries to help them fight the war? Why or why not

History
1 answer:
Yuri [45]3 years ago
6 0
Yes it was a mistake because the mercenaries would not fully commit for the war and not be in the front lines. the americans would be very commited, and had alot of miltia groups that were not soldiers but just ordinary people who help guns
You might be interested in
What is Sargon known for?
il63 [147K]

Answer:

C or D

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How are the special powers granted to the senate different than the special powers granted to the house of representatives?
Firlakuza [10]
The senate has advice and consent powers. This means they do things such as sign treaties. The house focuses more on reviewing bills.
3 0
3 years ago
Human dwellings in early Mesopotamia were made of?
nlexa [21]

Answer:

mud-bricks

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role did alliances play in causing WWI?
Arturiano [62]

Answer: Alliances made nations over confident and reckless. They emboldened leaders to act recklessly. Leaders knew that if they did declare war, powerful allies were obligated to fight along with them. (No country wanted to be seen as an unreliable partner.)

Explanation: Hopefully this helps u with what ever u are doing. I don't know if this is the right answer.

4 0
2 years ago
How was the boston massacre different from the battles of the revolutionary war
andrezito [222]

Explanation: The Boston Massacre was different from the Revolutionary War because the war had actual battles whereas the Boston Massacre wasn't a battle, it was started because of a brawl between a British officer, it was merely a beating. The colonists were in the wrong and shouldn't have been harassing the Redcoats but the British should not have fired into a crowd of unarmed men and boys after they "supposedly" heard the word fire and killed five men and wounded six.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Name 3 things that the Abbasid Empire is known for.
    7·1 answer
  • A benefit of using good human relations is that you will
    12·1 answer
  • How did railroads affect the american economy in the middle of to late 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • What was jesus's core group of disciples?
    6·1 answer
  • What type of government is the social contract, as described by Rousseau, most like? *
    15·1 answer
  • What inventions led to the mechanization of the cotton industry after 1750?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did the union use a blockade policy against Louisiana during the civil war?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain why the United States experienced a shift from an industry-based economy to a service-based economy
    5·1 answer
  • Fun Fact: It Took about 5 Shermans With a 75 (Or The later 76 MM Gun) To Kill a Single Tiger 1 Tank, Although, it would not pene
    12·1 answer
  • The notes say that the Continental Congress created a committee to write a plan for government. Based on the notes, whom did the
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!