Answer: FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC)
Explanation:
Decisions made by the Department of Enforcement may be appealed to FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council (NAC).
The NAC is the national committee established to recheck or review initial pronouncements or decisions made in FINRA’s Department of Enforcements proceedings.
An individual or firm is given the right to appeal a hearing panel decision to the NAC under FINRA's disciplinary procedures. Sometimes the NAC may initiate a review of a decision on its own.
In the process of appeal, the NAC will evaluate whether the hearing panel's findings are right in legal context or not and in accordance with FINRA's Sanction Guidelines.
During a panel decision is on appeal, the sanction of the former proceeding on an individual or firm is not enforced.
However, an individual or firm can further appeal FINRA's decision to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and then to federal court.
I’m quite unsure to be honest but I think it’s Social Anxiety.
The intended goal was for them to define their teachings.
Answer:
From the group of choices provided the correct option is letter "b".
Explanation:
Rent control is an illustration of a price ceiling because it sets the maximun price that a landlords can charge tennants. And the minimum wage is an illustration of a price floor, because it represents the minimum amount that can be charged for a product, good or service.
Answer:
d. Internal coherence demonstrates the rational relationship between parts of a hypothesis.
Explanation:
The<u> statement "d" best describes the internal coherence of a hypothesis </u>because if the different parts of a hypothesis aren't coherent with each other, aren't related, there's no internal coherence in the first place. All the different parts have to have a rational relationship, have to be rational with each other.
