Answer:
$75,000 recognised gain
Explanation:
Indigo corporation wants to transfer $150,000 in cash or property to one of its shareholders Linda
Property A has a basis of $75,000
Property B has a basis of $195,000
Therefore the recognized gain or loss of property A is distributed in redemption of Linda's share can be calculated as follows
= fair market value - basis
= $150,000-$75,000
= $75,000 recognised gain
Hence indigo's recognised gain if it distributes property A in redemption of Linda's share is $75,000
Answer:
$4,000
Explanation:
Implicit cost is the cost which is an income foregone internally, that is not the exact opportunity cost, here opportunity cost is salary foregone, that is $60,000.
But implicit cost would be $4,000 if the financial assets are now used in business, and are not left as they are.
Implicit cost is internally generated opportunity cost.
Since here he outlays, $8,000 let us say these were used earlier as financial assets to generate revenue, now $4,000 would be considered as implicit cost, that is earlier generated revenue from internal funds.
Final Answer
$4,000
Answer:
21.9%
Explanation:
Given that
Operating leverage = 7.3
Increase in sales = 3%
According to the given situation, the computation of net operating income is shown below:-
Increase in operating income = Operating leverage × Increase in sales
= 7.3 × 3
%
= 21.9%
Therefore for computing the increase in operating income we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
d. Hexagon Inc. cannot be challenged in a court even when it fails to follow up on its promises.
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The action, looking through the paradigm of Utilitarianism would be considered ethical.
Any action especially by the ruling powers, government or political class which regardless of the rule of law is aimed at engineering the social, economic and or political levers of any state to the end that it betters society as a whole would be considered Utilitarian.
Utilitarianism is simply a theory or philosophy which preaches and teaches the need for happiness or pleasure whilst condemning any action, policy, thought or law that stimulates harm and unhappiness.
According to the question, the Privacy Act of 1974 had debarred the acquisition of Intelligence especially for the purpose of transacting business. Sooner or later it purchased, through an entity, information about its citizens on the basis of the need for National Security.
The act of seeking the welfare of the state thus becomes permissible reason under an utilitarian government for it to break a protocol or an existing edict.
Cheers!
Cheers!
