To combine these sentences together to flow neatly and be grammatically correct you could say: Early airships such as zeppelins were filled with hydrogen, but today's blimps use helium instead. This is the correct answer out of your choices.
Your answer is: Early airships such as zeppelins were filled with hydrogen, but today's blimps use helium instead.
Have an amazing day and stay hopeful!
Answer: The first passage of the story is about the history of formation of the Yellowstone National Park, this includes the information why it is significant, which means that author appeals to readers' emotions, describing the park with great interest and passion. The second passage has no mood, just contains some facts and statistics which would have a less appealing factor to the reader.
Explanation:
Answer:
this isn't a question, we can't help u write an essay
No light can escape from it. If the way we see things and colors is the light being absorbed and reflected, we cannot see a black hole if no light can be reflected. The only way scientists can tell if a black hole is present is the impact of it to the surrounding stars and gas.
Answer:
A moral dilemma is shown here
Explanation:
Starting with the last word, <em>perfidy </em>is a deliberate breach of faith or trust; in the context of war - we can assume that this the case because of the word <em>peace</em><em> loving country</em> - perfidy can actually lead to warcrimes, like waving a white flag and then kill the enemy.
So the moral dilemma is that a country is very likely to be uncomfortable with a pact, the other side probably being a bit of a war loving country, but diplomatic relations deny the possibility of breaking the pact.
The part <em>not wishing to take the initiative of breaking the pact </em>is, if I´m not mistaken, a subordinate adjective clause that refers to the noun <em>country</em>.
So this country, not wishing etc., could not resort to perfidy either. Because that would be even worse, considering the fact that it is a peace loving country.
