Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
Answer:
sandwiches
Explanation:
supplier has plenty of spare capacity to increase output
high stocks levels are available to meet raising demand
short production time frame to get products to market
easy of factor substitution is high
Strategic leaders use internal and external analyses in tandem to create a customized fit between a company's internal resources and external environment.
<h3>Who are
Strategic leaders?</h3>
The center of attention for organizational learning is on strategic leaders. They encourage an environment of inquiry and look for lessons in both successful and bad results.
Organizational structure, resource allocation, and strategic vision are all functions of strategic leaders. Strategic leaders deal with extremely complex challenges in an uncertain environment while also being influenced by external events and organizations.
Process simplification, increased strategic productivity, and innovation are all benefits of strategic leadership. Employees may be independent, productive, and push for new ideas under this leadership. Programs for incentives and rewards are essential for strategic leaders. They support staff members in achieving their strategic objectives.
To know more about strategic leaders refer to:brainly.com/question/15171930
#SPJ4
Answer:
Debit Expenses $90,000; credit Accrued wages and salary $90,000
Explanation:
If we assume that the City of Juneau maintains its books and records to facilitate the preparation of its fund financial statements. The employees paid from the general fund had earned $90,000 on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday (June 28, 29, and 30).
The entry, if any, should be made in the city’s general fund on June 30 is to: Debit Expenses $90,000; credit Accrued wages and salary $90,000
The amount has been incurred in the month but has not been paid hence it has to be captured as expenses for the month of June while the double entry will be that the amount is captured as accrued wages signifying that it has not been paid within the period it was incurred
