1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
4 years ago
12

people ability to express their will varies depending on their country's form of government. how do the governments of japan, no

rth Korea, and the Philippines differ in their attention or lack thereof to the will of the people?
History
1 answer:
MissTica4 years ago
3 0

The full answerisin the document attached, this is just a preview since there is a character limit.

Psragraph...

After analyzing the three states, there a lot of conclusions that can be made. First of all, these states have a division of power. There are different organs, responsible for ruling over different matters. Philippines, on one side, is a more liberal State on its formation; its constitution contains a bill of rights, belonging those to some universal principles, such as but not limited to, habeas corpus and due process. On the other hand, North Korea has division of power as well, being the Supreme People´s Assembly the legislative power, the Presidium, responsible for regulating the power and duties of the SPA, and administering Justice at a National level. People  in North Korea do have rights and liberties, for example, work, education and health are granted rights, there is freedom of speech and religion,  there are elections, and some others, but what makes a difference between this and the other states is that the basis of the exercise of these rights is collective, not individual and this can be a limitation.  

The advantages of the socialist system in North Korea is that in theory, there should not be differences between people, but most importantly, there is a spirit of modernism and transformation thru the state, that´s an interesting view and an advantage: the people, collectively will build the country, and take it to a perfect place for everyone thru science and education, which is free from kindergarten to university. But the main disadvantage is that this model is not compatible with the rest of the world and it drives the nation to isolation, because they base their model in cultural principles which are not negotiable, such as Chongsanri spirit, which in short words is a model of inspiring people to work for the nation´s sake, not for a material compensation, which in western societies might be taken as deeply unfair.

On the other hand, Japan´s model is certainly a western-like constitutional model and similar to the Philippines, being some of the advantages that Japan grants free education to all its citizens, something that does not happen in Philippines, as their bill of rights focuses on individual freedoms and those rights which regulate the relationship between the state and the individuals, for example, the right to a speedy trial or not to incriminate oneself. Japan declares peace is one of their fundamental principles and that is the reason why Japan resigned to war or to use force to solve any further conflict. This is an advantage, because for a country, resigning to war means to dedicate in other efforts for the good of their citizens.  

Type of Government...

Each country has both similarities and differences. The second ones are more related with the names of the organisms which intervene in the government process, but the main duties are quite the same. Constitutionally speaking, North Korea is not a dictatorship taking into account that everything in the country belongs to its citizens, and that people can be elected as early as 17 years old to any position in the government. But the leader represents the foundation of the country, hence the nation,  and the leader are somewhat blended, and this is the reason why this position is actually inherited, so this is certainly a dictatorship in the practice, although their Constitution says that everything belongs to everyone and that the real power are the people.

Japan is a constitutional monarchy. The Emperor represents the unity of the people, in short words, he rules only on behalf of the people, and that is actually the source of his power: people, not a divine rule as it was in the past, when he used to be the son of the sun or some kind of semi god.  He has the authority to sign regulations and decrees, for example, but there is a Prime Minister, head of the executive branch, who is the head of the government, and there is also a Supreme Court and a Diet, which has the duties of a congress, composed by two houses.

As of the Philippines, it is a democracy, a republican form of state with its power divided in three branches, in which the head of the state is the President and the judiciary is under the control of the Supreme Court and the legislative branch is in charge of the Congress and Senate.            

To what extent can the people participate in the governing process of each country?

The participation in politics is equally granted in each one of these states; in North Korea, people can be elected to local or national Assembly, that is a constitutional right, similarly as it happens in the Philippines and Japan, where the right to suffrage is granted in the Constitution. This certainly, can be undermined by different local factors, such as corruption, lack of political parties or difficulties to access to the government or influence in decisions taken.    

Classification...


had to write so much but hope this helped ;(

You might be interested in
in what way were the influence of christianity and islam on postclassical society similar? a. both forced people to convert to t
cricket20 [7]
Both forced people to convert to their respective religions and this was the way in which the influence of Christianity and Islam on post classical society similar. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a".
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLS HELP ME! DUE NOW! **BRAINLIEST** 15PTS
djyliett [7]

Answer:

War is not only about the military but also about the resources.

Explanation:

War is not just about fighting on the battlefield. It requires some economic investment, so this is one of the more essential factors. The Union initially chose an offensive strategy that entailed attacks on the Confederacy's three territories backed by economic pressures. The Union also had a strong navy, so blocking the coast for the opposing side was a powerful blow to their economy. This strategy entailed a slow economic weakening of the opponents, which was ultimately crucial in the war.

The Confederacy was in an awkward position; they wanted to retain the right to secession. Their efforts to invade the North are a very thankless situation. The developed North, with infrastructure, could quickly move an army from one place to another. In that case, the Confederation had to agree to the fact that the North decides the time and place of the battle, which is an advantage at the outset. The Confederacy deployed troops along the borders, which contributed to the dispersal of the army. It acted offensively when the opportunity arose for such a manoeuvre. One example of offensive action is the attempt to conquer Colorado mines, which failed.

Such a constellation of relations contributed to the North's commitment to war. Developed industry, infrastructure, and economic blockade of the south are crucial factors in the victory of the North over the south.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Raphaels artworks are true
Arada [10]
Is there a image that goes with this question?
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the British colonies, which group of people participated in democracy?
mestny [16]

Id say A since women and slaves couldn't be involved with democracy

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements about France’s social structure before the revolution is not true? a. The First Estate was mad
Lynna [10]
The Fourth Estate was made up of peasants and city workers.
The Fourth Estate also contained bourgeoisie, which were people who had wealth that they had acquire, but did not have a noble title through hereditary or military means.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Define labor union ​
    9·2 answers
  • Which group favored a strong national government and proposed the us constitution?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Nixon’s visit to China impact the United States as a superpower? (Select all that apply) It eliminated the need for the
    11·2 answers
  • There is evidence that the monumental decision in _____________ in 1973 had a direct impact on crime years later.
    7·1 answer
  • Which was purchased by the United States?
    9·1 answer
  • The Marine barracks that was destroyed by a terrorist bomb during the Reagan administration was located in what country?
    15·2 answers
  • All cells are<br> produced from other cells<br> O True<br> O False
    9·1 answer
  • Which event occurred first? 1. Civil was breaks out between the Reds and the Whites. 2.A communist government forms the USRR. 3.
    10·1 answer
  • 5.Si _____ang itinuturing na Ama ng Arkeolohiya ng<br>Timog-Silangan Asya.​
    7·2 answers
  • Which Islamic caliphate was interested in mathematics?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!