1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
patriot [66]
2 years ago
15

Prompt: Why did European powers compete for control of Muslim states? PLEASE HELP

History
1 answer:
kifflom [539]2 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

European powers compete for control of Muslim states to gain access to the Middle East and to control trade routes to India.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is an accurate statement about the Justinian Code?
Eva8 [605]
<span>Justinian Code is the collections of laws and legal interpretations developed under the sponsorship of the emperor of </span>Byzantine named as Justinian.
this law gave women rights so that they can inherit property.
So according to above explanation,
A. <span>It supported a women’s right to inherit property, is the correct answer.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 were both meant to
blagie [28]

Answer:  create a compromise in which new states could be admitted to the Union.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the greatest threat to american expansion in the northwest
pishuonlain [190]
Weather, local tribes such as local Indians, and viruses
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates? A. The
valkas [14]
The that is  NOT a difference between parliamentary debate and both the policy and Lincoln-Douglass debates would be: <span>B. The parliamentary debate is the same as the Lincoln-Douglass debate style
The lincoln-douglass debate sytyle use one-versus-one format in the debate, meanwhile the Parliamentary debate style use two-versus-two format in the debate.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
What did Madison say about the size of the republic? Did he want big ones or small ones and why? (You can answer with a flow-cha
victus00 [196]

Answer:

Madison argued in favor of a larger republic

Explanation:

According to his paper "Federalist 10", Madison argued that a representative body that is too small be insufficient to represent all of the interests and opinions of the nation. The larger the representative body, the better since it allows more opinions and prevents tyranny.

"...the same advantage which a republic has over a democracy...is enjoyed by a large over a small republic," (Third to last paragraph of Federalist 10)

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A total lunar eclipse cannot be seen by everyone on the night side of the Earth. True False
    6·2 answers
  • Which country borders russia to the southwest and continues to have border disputes?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did world leaders follow a different plan for reconstruction following WWII than the one used following WWI?
    7·1 answer
  • What amendment in the bill of rights protects our rights to protest ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes how climate affected economic development in West Texas?
    5·1 answer
  • What happened to mongol territory between the years 1206-1294
    7·1 answer
  • Had a plantation economy Had settlers from many countries Had rocky soil that limited large scale farming Had a diverse economy,
    6·2 answers
  • How are the members of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) chosen?
    7·2 answers
  • Did women in shakespeare england have the sane rughts as wimen in other parts of the world.
    10·1 answer
  • How is your life today similar to or different from Jadzia's?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!