A type of personalist leader wielding military and political power. There is no precise definition and is often used interchangeably with "dictator" or "strongman"
They would feel that the national government is partial abusing their power
<span />
Answer:
<em>“All too will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal laws must protect, and to violate would be oppression.</em>
<em></em>
<em>"But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle"</em>
<em></em>
<em>"I shall find resources of wisdom, of virtue, and of zeal on which to rely under all difficulties"</em>
<em></em>
<em>"To you, then, gentlemen, who are charged with the sovereign functions of legislation, and to those associated with you, I look with encouragement for that guidance and support which may enable us to steer with safety the vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world"</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
The title of the map would be: "The states that made up the Italian Nation in the fifteenth century"
One of the distinctive features of the political organization in Italy was the importance of the city-states and in particular of the republics, which in the fifteenth century some had lost their independence, but not the Renaissance cities such as Florence and Venice. At the beginning of the fifteenth century the Italian territory was very fragmented in states of varying size and importance. The decline of the cities had led to a process of institutional strengthening, concluded with the establishment of signorie (the equivalent of the Iberian lordships), together with the oligarchic republics, founded previously.
The primary constitutional restrictions on the power of the states to set voting qualifications is that states cannot prevent or impeded anyone from voting based on their race, gender, creed, or religion.
