Answer:
Abraham Lincoln.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln was President of the United States from 1861 to 1865. Prior to his political career, he worked as a ferry, general merchant and post office manager, among others. Unlike previous presidents, he was a congressman for only one term. Even in the army, he served only a short time as a volunteer and was a mere soldier of military rank.
Lincoln had no intention of abolishing slavery, but of limiting it territorially and gradually, but this was seen as a threat in the south of the country. Shortly after taking office, the southern pro-slavery states seceded from the Union and formed the Confederation, and the United States plunged into civil war. In view of this situation, Lincoln saw the use of force as the only suitable means to maintain the union of the country, and avoid the effective secession of the Confederacy.
Finally, Lincoln managed to win the Civil War and unite the country. He greatly influenced the subsequent status of the black population in the United States and is widely regarded as one of the best presidents in the country.
Answer:
What accounted for the shift was the same thing that accounted for the shift in other parts of the world: the development of agriculture.
Explanation:
When a society develops agriculture, it shifts from being nomadic to being sedentary. This is because of two main, intertwined reasons:
The first is that growing crops is a burdensome activity that demands a lot of time, and care: ploughing the land, planting the seeds, tending the crops, caring for them, and picking them in time of harvest. This makes growing crops clash with a nomadic lifestyle.
The second reason is that agriculture is a more efficient way to produce food than hunting or gathering. Agriculture does produce a steady supply of food when the crops do not fail, while gathering and hunting hardly produces what is necessary for survival. This is an incentive for early societies to develop agriculture.
Answer:
Correct choice is <u>option D. </u>
Explanation:
A historian's work is similar to that of a police officer's. A historian researches a lot about whatever their topic is. They both go above and beyond to confirm his or his research or findings about a past history event. They both look for firsthand or even secondhand experiences on the subject. They both look for actual witnesses to support their claims on their findings.
