Answer:
Comparative advantage
Explanation:
This concept of economics is comparative advantage that means one country has advantage of producing same product at lower cost than other. In this question China has comparative advantage over USA,
This may be due to different reasons.
1. Population of China is greater than USA, that is why employees are willing to work on low salaries in China as compared to salaries are offered in the US.
2. China is comparatively better in manufacturing industry as of with USA.
Answer:
Their earnings per share may decrease.
Explanation:
Shareholders of a company may be reluctant to finance expansion through issuing more equity because Their earnings per share may decrease and at the same time debt is always better option to finance.
Answer:
IRR= 21.86%
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial investment (PV)= $10,000
Cash flows (PMT)= $4,000 per year
Number or years (n)= 4
<u>It is extremely difficult to calculate the IRR using the formula. We will use the financial calculator.</u>
Function: CMPD
n= 4
I%= SOLVE = 21.86%
PV= 10,000
PMT= -4,000
IRR= 21.86%
There isn’t any safety procedures on here and it says which of the following
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
