Answer:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland:
-The Second Bank of the United States was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not tax a federal institution
2- Gibbons v. Ogden:
-The state of New York was involved in the case.
-The Supreme Court ruled that a state could not regulate commercial activities between states.
-A state-granted one company exclusive rights over the Hudson river.
Explanation:
1- McCulloch v. Maryland was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1819, in which the state of Maryland was barred from levying a tax on federal banks operating in its territory. As a result, the principle of federalism triumphed over state rights, while the constitutional "Necessary and Proper Clause," which allows Congress to carry out certain actions not expressly stated in the Constitution but that appear to conform with those permitted activities, remained in effect.
2- Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court decision from 1824 that upheld the federal government's authority to control interstate trade. This is due to a dispute between New York and New Jersey, which was supposed to be settled by municipal courts but ended up breaching the Supreme Court's original authority and the states' right to equality.
The far west of the North American continent was inhabited by the native Americans and the French.
That's why <span>the original 13 colonies did not extend too far west into the north american continent as they wanted to avoid war with the French and Native Americans.</span>
The colonies because they were mad at England
One reason to join is if you have a struggling economy. The EU is a single trade union, and most of the countries in it use one type of note, called a euro. In joining the EU, a country will be able to be helped by A) The booming EU economy and B) The countries helping each other out. A reason someone might not join the EU is they already have a good economy and don't need help.
