<span>I believe the answer is: Mr. Jones had signed an authorization to disclose the information for the test results and the result should be given to the health department.
By making this authorization, Mr. Jones has given Dr. Marks with the right to handle the information regarding his personal test as long as its within the scope of health department database. This would take out all the legal grounds that Jones could use to sue Dr. Marks.</span>
Morality in your life would mean living knowing the differences between good and bad and staying away from the bad.
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
