Edward l. thorndike proposed the ________, which is a cornerstone principle for operant conditioning.

1 answer:

8 0

Edward l. Thorndike proposed the law of effect, which is a cornerstone principle for operant conditioning. The law of effect states that responses followed by a satisfying outcome are more likely to be repeated,
while responses followed by unpleasant outcomes are less likely to be repeated. This is making this law the principle of operant conditioning , which is a learning process in which behavior is shaped and maintained by consequences (rewards or <span>punishments) that follow a response. </span>

You might be interested in

article ll , section 3 states that the presidant '' shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed ''. this is the contitu

galben [10]

The answer to this question is Chief Executive.

3 0

4 years ago

Critically discuss TWO emotional / personal benefits that will motivate you to find<br> a job.

serg [7]

Money, money and money, and having people not call me lazy would be nice-

6 0

3 years ago

According to evolutionary theory, how does a new species develop?

____ [38]

Organisms (belonging to the same species) may adapt in different ways to better exploit different environments or resources-- survival of the fittest. They also may evolve varied characteristics for attracting mates for reproduction. This means that different groups evolve differently. Over time, these groups or populations may become so different that they can no longer breed together -- and separate species are formed.

3 0

3 years ago

In erevelles and minear, crenshaw argues that social movements about single identity politics have

stiv31 [10]

Crenshaw points out that social movements based on a single identity politics, such as the Feminist Movement, LGBT and Disability Rights Movement have historically combined or ignored within-group differences. This has sometimes resulted in growing tensions between the social movements themselves.

7 0

3 years ago

What is a risk? How can you differentiate it from a disaster? In both the cases are you safe? Which can be handled better? How?

Kruka [31]

Effective catastrophe reduction requires a clear difference between disaster prediction and risk assessment. Disaster prediction models things that are at danger of hazard, damage, or loss, whereas risk assessment models the scene's likelihoods in future bad situations.

You should be prepared to deal with severe weather or any calamity that may strike your region, such as hurricanes, earthquakes, extreme cold, flooding, or terrorism. You should also be prepared to live alone for at least three days. This might include supplying your own shelter, first aid, food, water, and sanitation.

Take the following precautions to limit your risks of being injured:

• GET DOWN ON YOUR KNEES BEFORE THE EARTHQUAKE KNOCKS YOU DOWN. This stance keeps you from falling while still allowing you to manoeuvre if necessary.

• COVER your head and neck (and, if feasible, your entire body) behind a strong table or desk. If no shelter is available, get down against an interior wall or low-lying furniture that won't fall on you and protect your head and neck with your arms and hands.

• HOLD ONTO YOUR SHELTER (OR YOUR HEAD AND NECK) UNTIL THE SHAKE ENDS. Prepare to relocate your shelter if the earthquake causes it to shift.

To know more about "disaster" refer to this link:

brainly.com/question/13505932?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ1

4 0

1 year ago