Answer:
The first one is the only one that can Be right as long as he has a us citizenship.
The 2nd one only can Be right if she was born in the us and has citizenship . The others are wrong.
<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
Answer:
Option C: FILIBUSTERING
Explanation:
filibustering is simply an a formal and public act or way of preventing a bill to be voted on in the senate debate. It usually entails an active serving senator taking the floor for debate and talks as long as he can, for, as long as a senator has the floor, the bill in question cannot be voted on.
It is only used in the senate due to the fact that the senate does not share a time limit on how long the bill can be debated on.
I can help you read. I just need to know what about
The answer to this question is the science of forensic study
