Answer:
Both scenario A and D.
Explanation:
The study examining infants' ability to do simple arithmetic that showed infants one or two dolls and then either added or subtracted a doll from behind a screen demonstrated that infants were surprised in which of A: A doll is placed behind a screen where another doll was initially present, and lowering of the screen reveals a single doll and D: A doll is removed from behind a screen where two dolls were initially present, and lowering of the screen reveals two dolls.
Answer:
Predictive validity.
Explanation:
This is a psychological term which is used go check the extent to which one form of test can be used in the prediction of the others outcome calculating the correlative coefficient which make up the calculation criterion.
In this psychological situation, this validity is seen to be used in helping to address certain questions, because as its name predictive validity implies, it well addresses how well a specific tool predicts future behavior. Experts have shown that is is calculated by the correlation coefficient between the results of the assessment and the subsequent targeted behavior. The stronger the correlation between the assessment data and the target behavior, the higher the degree of predictive validity the assessment possesses.
Natural resources are resources produced by the Earth and occur in nature, hence "natural". They can replenish quickly, or take millions of years to form, like oil and some precious metals and jewels. Hope this helped!
Answer:
More, had a comparative advantage, produce more
Explanation:
In the previous example, the United States and Brazil were efficient when they specialized. Brazil choose to specialize in the production of bananas because it in producing it. The United States and Brazil when they specialize.
I think the answer is b or c because B is all about money. When you have lost of money you want a lot of things. while c is saying how people back then had to work for people and they got noting for it.
