The appropriate response is extrinsic motivation. This alludes to conduct that is driven by outside prizes, for example, cash, popularity, evaluations, and acclaim. This sort of inspiration emerges from outside the person, rather than natural inspiration, which starts within the person.
fighting for the country is saving it. or they want to make sure there family can be as safe as possible and that's how they do it. :) plz make me brainlyist
Yes, people were upset by such a high tax on many goods that they threw a lot of tea over board.
Base on the behavior of Carlos, the best approach that will
explain the behavior that he has shown would empathy altruism hypothesis. This
is where a person has the ability of feeling empathy in other people and tries
to put themselves in their situation, where in they try to be more
understanding and tries to share the same emotion that the person would feel
because of the situation that he or she is in. It is also with this, it makes a
person help the other party without expecting anything from return and helping
them because he or she wants to and not because he or she is expecting anything
or is only obliged to do it. It is seen from Carlos actions as he helps the
woman who has been begging for alms and tries to put himself into her shoes
where he felt pain into seeing her go through in that situation.
I believe the answer would be C, taxation without representation caused anger.
In 1765, the stamp act congress met in New York to declare that the English Crown was not entitled to tax Americans who lacked representation in British parliament.
