Answer:
a. The common stockholders.
Explanation:
A company's retained earnings have a financing cost associated with them because retained earnings belong to the common stockholders.
Retained earnings can be defined as the accumulated profits or net income generated by an organization but are not distributed or given as dividends to the stockholders, rather are reinvested in to the business.
Generally, retained earnings are used to pay off debts, used for capital expenditures and working capitals.
Retained earnings represents the total stockholders' equity reinvested back into the company.
Explanation:
Area = Area of sides + area of semicircle thing
= (2*0.21*0.31) + (2*0.31*0.61) + (0.21*0.61) + ( 3.14*0.105*0.61) + (3.14*0.105*0.105) = 0.872 m^2
Total area = 0.872 *1106 =964.43 m^2
Answer =965 m^2
The journal entry to reflect this transaction would include a credit to T. Dole, Capital in the amount of $90,000.
<h3>
What journal entries?</h3>
- A journal entry is an act of keeping or producing records of any economic or non-economic transaction.
- An accounting journal, which shows a company's debit and credit balances, records transactions.
- The journal entry can be made up of multiple records, each of which is either a debit or a credit.
- Otherwise, the journal entry is termed unbalanced if the sum of the debits does not equal the total of the credits.
So, the journal entry to reflect this transaction would include a credit to T. Dole, Capital in the amount of cash invested, and the fair market value.
30,000 + 60,000 = $90,000
Therefore, the journal entry to reflect this transaction would include a credit to T. Dole, Capital in the amount of $90,000.
Know more about journal entries here:
brainly.com/question/14279491
#SPJ4
The complete question:
T. Dole invests cash and land into an existing partnership. The cash invested is $30,000 and the land has a fair market value of $60,000. The journal entry to reflect this transaction would include a credit to T. Dole, Capital in the amount of $ ______.
Answer:
c. lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because they take the same amount of money from both poor and rich.
Explanation:
To understand this question, you have to first understand what lump-sum taxes are.
Lump-sum taxes are a system of taxes where everybody pays the same amount of tax no matter their economic status, or their actions. Basically, lump-sum taxes take the same amount of money from the rich and the poor, hugely increasing the burden on the poor and lessening that of the rich.
As an example, a lump-sum tax of $100 would require everybody to pay $100. To a person earning, say $120, that would be a huge hit, and be a huge burden on his normal life. However, to a rich person who earns, say, $10000, that would be much more easier for the rich person.
Hence, lump-sum taxes are often viewed as unfair because of the unfair advantage the rich have over the poor in tax-paying.
Hope this helped!
