Answer:
c. buying rupees from National Bank at the ask rate and selling them to American Bank at the bid rate.
Explanation:
- Locational arbitrage is a strategy in which one seeks profits from the difference in exchange rates for the same currency at different banks.
- In our case for locational arbitrage one will have to buy Indian rupee from National bank at the ask rate and then sell them to American bank at the bid rate to make profit.
Answer: Encourage and track complaints
Explanation:
Encourage and track complaints is a method of customer service some organization implemented to curb some customer service issue or likely monitor how well their product and services are or how well their workers treat their customers. This method of customer service operation helps the firm not to loose potential clients and customers already with them but still likes in the hands the clients or customer's feedback.
Answer:
Here is what I found, I hope it helps
Explanation:
Gross Income contains all money you earn that is not expressly removed from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The part of your gross income which is currently subjected to taxes is Taxable Income. To arrive at the number of Taxable Income, expenses are deducted from gross income. For a year, your Gross Income applies to all your pre-tax earnings, while your Adjusted Gross Income is mostly smaller and refers to your income after tax deductions. I could not find the difference between Adjusted Gross Income and Taxable Income.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
