Answer: There is a weak, positive correlation between the weight Lucy lost and the number of weeks.
Explanation:
The correlation coefficient is used to measure the relationship between two variables in terms of how they move in relation to one another.
If two variables are said to have a positive correlation, it means that they increase at the same time and decrease at the same time for example, there is a positive correlation between the amount of food a family buys and how much money they have because the more money they have, the more food they buy.
Negative correlations are the reverse for instance Ice cream sales and cold temperatures. The colder it is, the less people buy ice cream.
The Correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to +1 with +1 (-1) meaning that the variables are perfectly positively(negatively) correlated. The closer the value is to 0, the weaker the correlation.
Generally, for a correlation coefficient between the numbers 0 and +0.3, there is a weak positive correlation.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.0502, there is therefore a weak, positive correlation between the weight Lucy lost and the number of weeks.
Hello there!
The correct answer is A:
State governments tend to be more responsive to social movements than the federal government because they are able to test out new programs on a smaller scale.
It is my pleasure helping students here!
~Garebear
Answer:
N/A
Explanation:
PLEASE AFTER THIS ANSWER MAKE QUESTION MORE CORRECT.
Answer:
There is no solutions to this problem.
Because when you solve it you get an untrue statement. When this happens, it means that there is nothing that can make it true.
Explanation:
3x + 13 = 3(x + 6) + 1 use distribute property
3x + 13 = 3x + 18 + 1 combine like terms
3x + 13 = 3x + 19 subtract 3x from both sides
13 = 19
Answer: The answer to your question is B) GDP does not take into account long-term environmental costs.
Explanation: Enjoy!