<span>Since a peasant owns little property and works in the employ of a landowner or business owner, he or she would have little concern for the loss of property and be less concerned if the flow of products is disrupted. He or she would also have more incentive to invest in a revolution that upended the status quo and allowed for more mobility within the social and economic hierarchies. The merchant would be invested in quelling any rebellion that would interrupt the economy and cause destruction of property and good.</span>
The answer is none of the above, i dont know how but i was just asked the same question and got it wrong so yeah lol
Hello!
This would be considered a primary source since it came directly from Hillary Clinton. If it were a paraphrased version of her speech, for example, then it would be considered a secondary source.
I hope this helps you! have a great day!
