<span>In regards to providing advisory services as opposed to providing transaction-based, this would be considered consultant servicing. This is due to the fact that there is an ongoing consultation occurring between the servicer and the client at hand, rather than single, one-off transactions.</span>
Answer:
0%
Explanation:
Given that,
Growth rate of money supply = 3% per year
Real GDP growth rate = 3% per year
Velocity = Constant
According to the quantity growth theory of money,
M + V = P + Y
where,
M = Growth rate of money supply
V = Velocity
P = Inflation rate
Y = Real GDP growth rate
M + V = P + Y
3% + 0 = P + 3%
3% - 3% = P
0% = P
Therefore, the inflation rate is 0%.
First of all, the laissez-faire economics is also known as hands-off apporach. This is from the 19th century. The leaders of the Middle class had a good reponse by embracing this type of approach. Some of the people looked to modify this kind of apporach for the government to have more control. Generally was accepted but also wished to be modified in order for the high class leaders to get control
Answer:
1. Entrepreneurs can only be successful if they have large funding backing them.
2. Entrepreneurs have cushy hours.
3. Entrepreneurs have to do everything themselves.
5. Entrepreneurs have to take huge risks.
7. Entrepreneurs are never stressed out.
8. Entrepreneurs are all wealthy.
9. Entrepreneurs are their own boss.
10. Entrepreneurs have more personal time.
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
