Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
1. Accounts receivable A/c Dr $160
To Sales discounts forfeited $160
(Being sales discount is recorded)
The computation of the sales discount is shown below:
= (Sales value - payment made) × discount rate
= ($40,000 - $24,000) × 1%
= $160
2. Cash A/c Dr $16,000
To Accounts receivable A/c $16,000
(Being cash is received)
Answer:
Darby Company
The amount of interest payable at December 31, Year 1 is:
$76.67
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cash Revenue = $1,300
Bank Note Payable = $2,300
Interest rate on Bank Note = 10%
Issue date of bank note = September 1, Year 1
Term of bank note = 1 year
Amount of interest payable on December 31, Year 1:
= $2,300 * 10% * 4/12 = $76.67
b) The amount of interest payable on the loan totals $230 ($2,300 * 10%). However for Year 1, the interest payable is reduced to 4 months (September 1 to December 31, Year 1), amounting to $76.67. This implies that the remaining interest ($153.33) will be payable in the period between January 1 and August 31 in Year 2. In accordance with the accrual and matching principles of generally accepted accounting principles, interest expense must be accrued to the period when the expense is incurred and matched to the revenue it has generated.
An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
<h3>What is
blockbusting?</h3>
blockbusting can be regarded as the act of profiteering through inducing property owners to sell hastily which do occur at a loss by appeals to fears of depressed values.
In this case, An example of blockbusting is causing panic selling by telling people that value in a neighborhood will decline due to the purchase of homes by minorities.
Learn more about blockbusting on:
brainly.com/question/24452126
#SPJ1
Answer:
The percentage change in nominal GDP from 2013 to 2014 was 4.29%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was 1.48%
The percentage change in real GDP from 2012 to 2013 was higher than the percentage change in real GDP from 2011 to 2012. FALSE
Explanation:
In order to calculate this we just have to calculate the percentages with a rule of thirds:

To calculate the first one we use the nominal GDP which is the GDP with the current market value:

To calculate the change in real GDP we use the values adapted to a pre-agreed monetary value, in this case the dollar at 2009:

To calculate the 2011 to 2012 we insert the values:

So with this we know that it is wasn´t higher the percentage change from 2012-2013, than that of 2011-2012