It could either be a hill, lake, waterfall, mountain or they just built a wall to divide themselves
At the time, the government was considered to be democratic, the only federalist officers were the judges. In marbury v Madison the judge, was a federalist (Judge Marshall). What happened was Jefferson order the Secretary of state to not deliver commissions to federalist judges. Marybury sued for commissions, which created the case. What was significant was Marshall used the judiciary act to rule Marbury had commission, but it gave the court grater power than the constitution make the act unconstitutional. Marbury lost the case but the federalist judges won in the end. This case created Judicial review which let the supreme court exercise the power to decide weather an act of congress was allowed by the constitution. This gave the judges more power
Answer:
All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty.
Explanation:
There are various assumptions used by a LP allocation problem and they are; any return from an allocation is not dependent of other allocations; it is possible to compare returns from varying allocations; total returns equals the sum of all returns that all the activities yielded. The only option that is not an assumption used by a LP allocation problem is "All data are unknown with decision making under uncertainty."
<span>A type of deception in which one person withholds information that another person deserves to know is referred to as </span>omission.
I believe you mean a member of the House of representatives: these are elected for a number of two years.- but in practice the members can be re-elected and there is no limit on how many times they can be re-elected.
