Answer:
Judicial Activism:
Courts play active role in shaping social policy
Considers how social conditions and values have changed over time
Involves active interpretation of Constitution
Judicial restraint:
Involves strike interpretation of the Constitution
Limits power to strike down laws
Relies heavily on precedent
Explanation:
I wasn't entirely sure where to put 'Relies heavily on precedent', but I eventually decided on Judicial restraint because Judicial activism is about making decisions based on what is happening now, not what happened in the past, so it couldn't go there.
It's been a few years sense I studied this, and I found this website to be very helpful reviewing:
http://www.differencebetween.net/language/words-language/difference-between-judicial-activism-and-judicial-restraint/
Hopefully it and this answer will be helpful :)
