A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must appl

Question

3 years ago

5

A result of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) decision was that states must not interfere with commerce between individuals. must appl

y national law to commerce within their borders. could prohibit any commerce within their borders. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

History

2 answers:

Wewaii [24] · Answer 1 · 2022-02-07T20:23:51+03:00

A result of the Gibbo V. Ogden (1824) decision was that state could regulate commerce only within their borders. This was a landmark decision in which united state supreme that held the power to regulate interstate commerce. The landmark was considered decision with ripple effect that lasted for 1000 years.

Liono4ka [1.6K] · Answer 2 · 2022-02-07T21:55:45+03:00

Liono4ka [1.6K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

D. could regulate commerce only within their borders.

Just took test.