Simply put, governance is the exercise of control. Currently, it depends on the topic at hand. If we define it on a personal level, it means that a person is unable to regulate themselves.
But typically it pertains to governing a state (state means any organised territory). Now, while the idea of bad governance is straightforward, the causes that give rise to it are far too nuanced. Let's examine some of the underlying reasons now:
- a lack of probity, integrity, and ethics.
- corruption in the system is widespread. Favoritism, theft, bribery, and other forms of corruption are all examples of corruption.
- Lack of technology because people are unwilling to adopt it.
- hesitation in choosing an impartial Ombudsman.
People frequently avoid paying taxes to the government because they have little faith in its apparatus. This frequently results in the government spending less on development and adding to the strain on tax payers by giving them fewer resources to survive on. Only by educating the general community about ethical issues can this vicious cycle be broken.
A society's government can be viewed as a whole. A society's political environment would look the same if its mentality encouraged corruption.
<span>1) Suppose the world price of steel rises substantially. The demand for labour among steel-producing firms in Northern Ontario will increase. The demand for labour among automobile-producing firms in Southern Ontario, for which steel is an input, will decrease. The temporary unemployment resulting from such sectoral shifts in the economy is best described as structural unemployment.
2) Suppose the government wants to reduce this type of unemployment. Which of the following policies would help achieve this goal? Check all that apply.
b) Establishing government-run employment agencies to connect unemployed workers to job vacancies.
</span><span>c) Offering recipients of unemployment insurance benefits a cash bonus if they find a new job within a specified number of weeks.</span>
Answer:
a) it gave too much power to the people.
d) it didn't answer a lot of specific questions as to how to run the country.
Explanation:
The Articles of Confederation failed because they did not give Congress and the national government enough power. The new United States just fought a war to end what they considered tyrannical rule of a strong government that overpowered local government and the leaders of the U.S. feared a powerful central government.
I'm going to say False but I think the person gets a foul.
Saskatchewan, followed by Alberta and Manitoba.
