The answers are A. Romeo is missing
and C. Rosaline has refused Romeo again
Answer and Explanation:
The lines present an indirect characterization of the characters, where we can know their characteristics through the dialogue.
In this case we can affirm, through the dialogue it is possible to recognize Danforth as a very serious and strict judge, since he demands that the depositions be based on evidence. Hale is very confident, as he believes I have proof for everything he wants to show.
This question is about the play "The crucible" that represents the moment of exteria and religiosity that promoted the Salem trials.
Shakespeare is the guy you're thinking of. I'm not sarcastic just needed to add extra stuff to fill the 20 characters minimum
Answer:
A. To follow an introductory element.
Explanation:
The answer cannot be option B., because there is <em>no conjunction</em> after the comma is placed. The answer cannot be C., because if the comma were to interupt, the sentence would not, in fact, be grammatically correct (in context). And finally the answer cannot be D., because there is <em>no list of words and/or description</em>, after the comma. This leaves us only with option A., which is the correct answer because: after the comma is placed within the sentence, directly after it are adjective, that introduce and describe the values of her dress, which in this case would act as the direct object.
His purpose<span> is </span>to r<span>eunite the North and South using </span>personification <span>show how both aren't very different.</span>
