No mode. There are no two or more of the same price in the given situation.
Answer:
She descended 2 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
Therefore, g(-2) = -6
Basically substitute x = -2 in the equation.
Answer:
x-intercept: (4, 0)
y-intercept: (0, 3)
Step-by-step explanation:
The intercepts of the equation can be found by setting each variable to zero and solving for the other. The graph will be a line through the intercept points.
<h3>Intercepts</h3>
Setting x=0 and solving for y, we have ...
4y -12 = 0 ⇒ y = 12/4 = 3
Setting y=0 and solving for x, we have ...
3x -12 = 0 ⇒ x = 12/3 = 4
The intercepts are ...
x-intercept: (4, 0)
y-intercept: (0, 3)
<h3>Graph</h3>
The line will go through these intercept points.
Answer:
D - No, the ordered pair (4,9) is a solution to this problem.
Step-by-step explanation:
If you plotted the number of snacks as the x-axis, and then the total cost of the snacks on the y-axis, you would be able to graph a line and see the cost of snacks based on the number purchased. If you were going to write an equation for this, it would be y=2.25x (or y = 2 1/4 x)
In this case, as each snack is the same price, the y-values for each x would be as such: (1, 2.25) <- one snack, $2.25;
(2, 4.5)
(3, 6.75)
(4, 9)
So that is why the ordered pair of (4,9) would be a solution to this problem.
Hope that makes sense!
